Dear fellow generals,
As my main army is humans, I was exited to learn our shooters have been buffed quite a bit last Clash of Kings. Our crossbows (and their upgrade -rifles) have lost the Pot Shot! rule after they lost the Reload! in 2nd edition. This is quite a buff, as our shooters now can move-and-shoot and still hit on sixes. (in contrast to sevens, which used to be the case). This same rule also applies to Basilean crossbow men at arms, dwarf ironwatch and many others.
My question to you: do you actually use these new units?
Recently, I’ve been toying with a new army, a classical pike-and-shot army which features the newly buffed pikemen in conjunction with a horde of riflemen. (This army needs some fast-moving support from knights and the KoM flying heroes to work well, but that’s another matter). My army started out with a horde of bowmen which have since then been upgraded to crossbows and then to rifles and I must say I’m not disappointed.
They will do damage even to heavily armoured units if left alone (averaging 4 wounds to def 5+ if not in cover, 2 if in cover) and their nigh nerve means they stick around unless serious resources are diverted to kill it. That said, it’s over 200 points which is very expensive for what they do. Their saving grace is that they unlock.
A wizard + pegasus + alchemists curse will do more for fewer points, but requites an unlock. It’s that I don’t have the unlocks at this moment that this is not an option.
I’m curious how you look at this and if any of you use the new ranged weapons?
Finally: I’m bothered more than I should be by the moniker “rifles”.
A rifle is a type of firearm that was not used for war until the late 18th century (first used in the American war of revolution, 1775-1783) an does not fit the midieval-renaissance theme Kings of War has. The firearms used on the European battlefields during the 15th-16th century were either arquebusses or muskets. The latter has the musket-and-bayonet implication of the 18th and 19th century, which makes it (IMHO) unsuitable to the Kings of War “feeling”.
In 2nd edition, this unit was named “aquebussier” which is the correct name. I’m not sure why it changed, but probably because a lot of people couldn’t pronounce it. If this is the case, why not name it “handgunner” or simply “upgrade the unit with firearms/matchlocks/handguns” instead of the incorrect “rifles”.
I realize this is a form of history nerd bother, but as long as I’m not name calling, why not?